<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Math Proofs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://studyhut.com/blog/general/math-proofs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://studyhut.com/blog/general/math-proofs</link>
	<description>South Bay Tutoring</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:16:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Study Hut Master</title>
		<link>http://studyhut.com/blog/general/math-proofs/comment-page-1#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>The Study Hut Master</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 18:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studyhut.com/blog/uncategorized/math-proofs#comment-549</guid>
		<description>As for the proof that the infinite summation of 1-1+1-1, is incorrect.  The reason being that your logic is flawed and laws of infinite summations is manipulated. 

Let me explain, the summation can either be 0 or a 1 given a finite number of periods n that denote the number of +1s and -1s, where if n is the total number of periods, then there are i +1s and n-i -1s.  This means that at any point in time of the infinite series your solution can be 0 or 1.

Your reasoning of being 1/2 is simplified and is actually the mean of the result, which makes sense since the arithmetic mean of 0 and 1 is 1/2.

Now consider this. There are two equations you mention (1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)+… = 0+0+0+0+, which would represent infiinite summation of (1-1)n, which will always equal 0.

and infinite sum of 1+(1-1) = 1+infinite sum (1-1) = always is 1.

The problem with your logic comes from the fact that you first mention that we have an equal number of +1 and -1, but then in your proof you present the possibility that the number of -1 and +1 are not equal in number which means i != n-i.  However, no sequence or series can determine if you get a -1 or a +1, which means probability must be involved, and if there is an equal chance of getting a -1 or a +1 on the very next cycle, then your expected sum will = 1/2 by stochastic properties.

If you need help understanding this, come see The Study Hut Master.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the proof that the infinite summation of 1-1+1-1, is incorrect.  The reason being that your logic is flawed and laws of infinite summations is manipulated. </p>
<p>Let me explain, the summation can either be 0 or a 1 given a finite number of periods n that denote the number of +1s and -1s, where if n is the total number of periods, then there are i +1s and n-i -1s.  This means that at any point in time of the infinite series your solution can be 0 or 1.</p>
<p>Your reasoning of being 1/2 is simplified and is actually the mean of the result, which makes sense since the arithmetic mean of 0 and 1 is 1/2.</p>
<p>Now consider this. There are two equations you mention (1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)+… = 0+0+0+0+, which would represent infiinite summation of (1-1)n, which will always equal 0.</p>
<p>and infinite sum of 1+(1-1) = 1+infinite sum (1-1) = always is 1.</p>
<p>The problem with your logic comes from the fact that you first mention that we have an equal number of +1 and -1, but then in your proof you present the possibility that the number of -1 and +1 are not equal in number which means i != n-i.  However, no sequence or series can determine if you get a -1 or a +1, which means probability must be involved, and if there is an equal chance of getting a -1 or a +1 on the very next cycle, then your expected sum will = 1/2 by stochastic properties.</p>
<p>If you need help understanding this, come see The Study Hut Master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Study Hut Master</title>
		<link>http://studyhut.com/blog/general/math-proofs/comment-page-1#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>The Study Hut Master</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 18:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studyhut.com/blog/uncategorized/math-proofs#comment-548</guid>
		<description>There is a reason in Mathematically reason why dividing by 0 is theoretically, meaningless. The divide by zero operation comes from a2+ab =0 and you say to divide both sides by 0, which is literally means, both sides of your equation would approach infinity as you divide by an infinitesimal number close to zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a reason in Mathematically reason why dividing by 0 is theoretically, meaningless. The divide by zero operation comes from a2+ab =0 and you say to divide both sides by 0, which is literally means, both sides of your equation would approach infinity as you divide by an infinitesimal number close to zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

